[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes.
- From: Patrick Donnelly <batrick@...>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 12:33:30 -0400
[Please stop top-posting.]
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Tim Hill <drtimhill@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually my point was to NOT abuse 'nil' .. you can re-read my posts if you
> like.
Your abuse of nil spawned this discussion. Sufficient mechanisms exist
to solve your problem so you'll have to forgive the push-back from
more conservative users of the language. Myopic feature cramming in
languages is what gave us Python.
--
Patrick Donnelly
- References:
- Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes., Dirk Laurie
- Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes., steve donovan
- Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes., David Heiko Kolf
- Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes., Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes., Jay Carlson
- Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes., Mark Hamburg
- Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes., Andrew Starks
- Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes., Tim Hill
- Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes., Patrick Donnelly
- Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes., Tim Hill
