Re: Empty? No. Array? No. Has? Yes.

[Thomas Jericke <tjericke@...>]

On 07/04/2013 08:51 AM, Philipp Janda wrote:
> Both approaches need an incompatible way of deleting values. In fact 
> *any* approach which allows storing nils needs a new syntax for 
> removing values (or new syntax for storing nil, `t[n] = nil` cannot be 
> used for both).

Isn't this the essence of the whole discussion? It doesn't matter wich 
solution for storing nils you prefer you will never find a way around this.

--
Thomas