Re: [ANN] LuLPeg v0.1

[Philippe Lhoste <PhiLho@...>]

On 12/06/2013 18:32, Alex Bradbury wrote:
> My only concern is the quirky license. I've never even seen the
> "Romantic WTF public license" used elsewhere. The MIT license as used
> by Lua, the original LPEG and most other projects in the Lua community
> is commonly used and well understood. Although it's not a big deal for
> people looking to use it in personal projects, the wacky license can
> be an extra barrier for people looking to use the software in company
> projects. Ultimately it's your choice and I respect that, but is there
> a strong reason you prefer this license over the more commonly
> recognisedt MIT?

The library can probably be dual-licensed, under this peculiar (but nice!) license, and 
under the more common Lua license...

--
Philippe Lhoste
--  (near) Paris -- France
--  http://Phi.Lho.free.fr
--  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --