[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Syntax sugar for default arguments
- From: Mark Gabby <mwgabby@...>
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 00:00:25 -0700
Ahh, of course! Silly me. Thanks for the clarification.
On Apr 20, 2013 11:57 PM, "Choonster TheMage" <email@example.com
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Mark Gabby <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> To whit:
> local function f(t, var)
> f(3, x or 2)
> Prints 2 in Lua 5.1. Wouldn't have thought of doing that though, thanks for
> the idea! This is a great idiom.
> (Am I missing something? Would your patch catch some case this wouldn't work
> On Apr 20, 2013 11:41 PM, "Dirk Laurie" <email@example.com> wrote:
>> function f(x,y=0)
>> function f(x,y or 0)
>> to mean
>> function f(x,y) y=y or 0
>> Neither would break existing code.
>> Which of the above should I choose to implement as a patch?
I think Dirk wants to patch the behavior into the function definition,
not the function call.