Re: Lua library bank? (Was: Ruby philosophy vs Lua philosophy

[Peter Drahoš <drahosp@...>]

On 9 Mar, 2013, at 21:49 , Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@trms.com> wrote:

> ...
> As I'm guilty of not sourcing my point, if you read my posts, you will
> see that I say exactly the same thing as you, perhaps with more
> needless suggested fixes. :)

Ah, yes indeed. I was distracted by the suggestion of LuaBuild which was the main reason I responded.

> Steve is right that perhaps Hisham doesn't want to be more
> restrictive. Is that the case, or does he not want to be the one that
> enforces restrictions or decides what they are?

We really do not need anyone to act as a gatekeeper. Just displaying the results of a CI system that tries to install packages on multiple systems (linux, windows, osx) and runs its tests would improve quality right away.

pd