Re: [suggestion] assert: accept functions as "message"-argument

[Jorge <xxopxe@...>]

On 14/01/13 14:55, Wolfgang Pupp wrote:
> My suggestion is to not only allow strings as "message"-argument, but
> also functions; if a function is supplied it only gets called when the
> assertion actually fails and is expected to return a string describing
> the problem. Example:

And what to do when your error handling function errors?

Yes, I do have bugs in my debugging code :\

Jorge