[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: unicode char ranges
- From: Richard Hundt <richardhundt@...>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:01:50 +0100
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:50 PM, Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 12:37:10AM +0200, Dirk Laurie wrote:
>> 2012/12/4 Marc Balmer <marc@msys.ch>:
>>
>>> this is bogus and wrong on so many levels.
>>
>>> there are 109'242 digital glyphs (codepoints) defined and
>>> what you offer here is just a poor and limited subset.
>>> totally useless.
>>
>> Bogus, wrong, poor, limited, useless.
>
> And he's not wrong.
One can be pragmatic without being correct. Which matters more
depends on whether or not you know and control the context.
R.
