Re: Bug: Literal strings in long format are not quite literal.

lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Bug: Literal strings in long format are not quite literal.
From: Finn Wilcox <finnw@...>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 19:33:10 +0000

On 02/11/2012 15:15, Jim Studt wrote:


It would be nice to have a long literal that was actually literal for when you need precise values.
e.g. you might want to embed a PNG, which has the offending pair in bytes 5 and 6, in a
machine generated source file.

Probably not a good idea anyway, as the compressed part could contain "]]"

Finn

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug: Literal strings in long format are not quite literal., Jim Studt
- Re: Bug: Literal strings in long format are not quite literal., Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo

References:
- Bug: Literal strings in long format are not quite literal., Jim Studt
- Re: Bug: Literal strings in long format are not quite literal., Rapin Patrick
- Re: Bug: Literal strings in long format are not quite literal., Jim Studt

Prev by Date: Re: Clearing up misconceptions about characters vs bytes in the manual
Next by Date: Re: Bug: Literal strings in long format are not quite literal.
Previous by thread: Re: Bug: Literal strings in long format are not quite literal.
Next by thread: Re: Bug: Literal strings in long format are not quite literal.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread