Re: how to prevent bugs without static type checking?

[steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Thijs Schreijer
<thijs@thijsschreijer.nl> wrote:
> If the "typical" library by Rob Hoelz can be combined with my "typex"
> library, then that could pretty much fill this gap.

I'd like to harmoize Penlight with this, and fill in MT.__type.
Standards are a good thing!

However, is the idea that __type (or tostring(__type)) should always
resolve to a sensible name for a type?

steve d.