[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: typed arrays
- From: Coda Highland <chighland@...>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:07:46 -0700
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Daniel Aquino
<mr.danielaquino@gmail.com> wrote:
> You could also do this with the C api though.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Coda Highland <chighland@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Tom <tmbdev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I was wondering whether there was any standard on typed arrays in the works,
>>> similar to what JavaScript offers.
>>>
>>> Of course, there are several libraries that provide this functionality, but
>>> the main use of typed arrays that I have isn't so much for
>>> computing/scripting with them (they are nice for that to be sure), but for
>>> interoperability between libraries with different array types: if each
>>> library knows how to convert to/from a standard typed array,
>>> interoperability becomes much easier.
>>>
>>> The ideal library might go a bit beyond the JS facility and allow both owned
>>> storage and pointing to already allocated storage in an existing structure
>>> (the user of the library would have to make sure that that's safe), and
>>> would provide array descriptors allowing for non-standard strides. But even
>>> a simple, standard 1D dense vector would greatly improve interoperability.
>>>
>>> T
>>
>> LuaJIT offers this through its FFI types. Perhaps you should check that out.
>>
>> /s/ Adam
>>
>
Indeed, you could write a few C functions to deal with a userdata or
lightuserdata object wrapping around a C or C++ vector.
/s/ Adam