Re: 5.2 refman misstates stack signature of luaL_len?

[Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>]

> Since this doesn't seem to have been caught yet, I'll point it out again:

It was caught and fixed. See
	http://www.lua.org/manual/5.2/manual.html#luaL_len

It is listed in
	http://www.lua.org/work/diffs-lua-5.2.0-lua-5.2.1-rc1.txt

but it's hard to find it... Here are the relevant lines:

	6103c6118
	< <span class="apii">[-0, +1, <em>e</em>]</span>
	---
	> <span class="apii">[-0, +0, <em>e</em>]</span>

Thanks for the report.