Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?)

lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?)
From: liam mail <liam.list@...>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:38:02 +0100

> The problem with that is that other implementations can give a
> different result for the exact same table.

Maybe the manual should explicitly state that it is implementation specific?

Liam

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Coda Highland

References:
- Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Dirk Laurie
- Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Petite Abeille
- Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Dirk Laurie
- Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Eduardo Ochs
- Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), liam mail
- Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?), liam mail

Prev by Date: Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?)
Next by Date: Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?)
Previous by thread: Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?)
Next by thread: Re: Testing for a sequence (was Re: Lua 5.2 Length Operator and tables (bug?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread