[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: proposal for change in for protocol
- From: Miles Bader <miles@...>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:03:25 +0900
Rena <hyperhacker@gmail.com> writes:
>>> That seems like a bad example - in my experience, the index value in
>>> an ipairs loop is useful more often than not.
>>
>> I dunno, I seem to ignore the key in awful lot of for loops...
>>
>> Given the prevalence of "iterate over the values only" in many
>> languages, it is a bit odd that Lua doesn't have it.
>
> Well, Lua does have it - it's ipairs(). You just discard the first
> return value if you don't need it.
Er, no, that's my point: I often use ipairs or pairs like that, but it
feels awkward. It would be nicer to not have a dummy variable.
-Miles
--
Back, n. That part of your friend which it is your privilege to contemplate in
your adversity.