lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Mike Pall <mikelu-1203@mike.de> wrote:
> Umm, why? The code base has little to do with Lua anymore. There's
> a define for the Lua version, but it's not used anywhere. The
> issues fixed by 5.1.5 over 5.1.4 aren't present or have already
> been fixed in LuaJIT 2.x.

Oh, this is good news for me. Does the same statement applies to Lua
5.2? i.e. The issues fixed by 5.2 over 5.1 are't present or have
already been fixed in LuaJIT 2.x.

Then it seems that LuaJIT 2.x is fairly stable and deserves a non-beta
version number, isn't it?