[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: alternative udata checking
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 00:08:31 -0200
> Why would changing to array notation change the mergability of these
> symbols? I have seen gcc guessing that a static array is constant
> (without the const declaration) so it can optimize more (which I guess
> also means removing duplicates).
Ah, I didn't know that. Does it mean that the compiler will emit the same
address to static variables in different modules? That's weird, but I guess
allowed by the standard...