[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Thoughts on lua_checkstack() implicit usage
- From: Rebel Neurofog <rebelneurofog@...>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 22:26:51 +0400
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Peter Cawley <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> It is documented in the 5.2 reference manual:
> "Several functions in the auxiliary library use internally some extra
> stack slots. ...
And there's an API function:
int lua_checkstack (lua_State *L, int extra);
So I realize there are extra slots and there are extra slots, right?
That's cool way not to give up "The 5 extra-slots" shadow mastery
so The Shadow may still protect clumsy programmers.
Anyway, let The Shadow Digit be with you all!