Re: syntactic sugar for imports and exports

[Xavier Wang <weasley.wx@...>]

i prefer "in" keywords....
在 2011-10-21 晚上11:49，"Tony Finch" <dot@dotat.at>写道：
>
> steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I suppose the chief obstacle to adoption is that this is fairly
> > specialized sugar, and not keyword-driven.
>
> Yes.
>
> For fans of hyperglycemic syntax, what I'm really doing is skating
> on the edge of full blown functional-style pattern matching and table
> comprehensions :-)
>
> > Another option for injection-syntax for modules would be something like this:
> >       return { @foo, @bar, @zig }
> > or
> >       return { foo=@, bar=@, zig=@ }
>
> I was thinking { = foo, = bar }
>
> Tony.
> --
> f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
> South Utsire, Forties: Southwesterly 5 to 7, perhaps gale 8 later. Rough.
> Occasional rain. Moderate or good.
>