Re: verification and linting of lua implementations

[steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>]

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:20 AM, David Manura <dm.lua@math2.org> wrote:
> things like DynASM may partly answer that, while the standard Lua
> implementation resorts mainly to C macros.)

I think that's one of the things that C99 can bring to the party, or
at least the intersection between C99 and C++. (Which is pragmatically
necessary given MS' reluctance to implement C99).  So at least the
macros could be inline functions.

steve d.