[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s)
- From: Axel Kittenberger <axkibe@...>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:43:59 +0200
I have yet to encounter a dynamic typed language that really solves
this nil vs nothing problem satisfactory. Lua may be better than
others but is no exception.
> It is clear that at the level of the C API, there is a difference
> between a stack of length 1 containing a nil and a stack of length
> 0. The Lua libraries are written in C and make use of the C API.
It is obvious it is, but not obvious it has to be that way.
- References:
- no return value vs. nil return value(s), Lorenzo Donati
- Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s), Florian Weimer
- Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s), Lorenzo Donati
- Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s), Florian Weimer
- Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s), Lorenzo Donati
- Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s), Dirk Laurie
- Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s), Lorenzo Donati
- Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s), Dirk Laurie
- Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s), Enrico Colombini
- Re: no return value vs. nil return value(s), Dirk Laurie
