|
On 18/07/2011 12.57, Dirk Laurie wrote:
Actually, the HTML version shows several signs of hand-coded HTML, in particular the universal omission of</p>, occasional omission of<p> where strictly it is required, variations in the case of HTML tags, etc. The first two of these are transgressions of the HTML standard, but forgiven by Firefox and presumably also by other browsers commonly used, since no-one has complained.
What manual are you referring to? 5.1 or 5.2?The 5.1 manual (http://www.lua.org/manual/5.1/manual.html) seems to be all right according to the W3C validator (http://validator.w3.org/).
-- Enrico