[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Markdown version of reference manual
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:38:13 -0300
> Actually, the HTML version shows several signs of hand-coded HTML,
> in particular the universal omission of </p>, occasional omission
> of <p> where strictly it is required, variations in the case of
> HTML tags, etc. The first two of these are transgressions of the
> HTML standard, but forgiven by Firefox and presumably also by other
> browsers commonly used, since no-one has complained.
The W3C Markup Validation Service at http://validator.w3.org/
says that http://www.lua.org/manual/5.1/manual.html
is valid HTML 4.01 Transitional as claimed in DOCTYPE section.
