[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Forward declaration of a table and (closure) function
- From: Steve Litt <slitt@...>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:21:00 -0400
Hi all,
In a program I'm doing "OOP" using a table called Columns and a
function called Columns.new() containing several other functions that
become, for want of a better word, "methods".
The purpose of this construct is as use-modifiable setup, so I'd like
to have the calls to it at the very top of the program, where users
expect user-modifiable stuff to be. So what I'd like at the top would be
something like:
columns = Columns.new({})
-- THESE *MUST* BE IN SPREADSHEET COLUMN ORDER!!!
-- IF THE SPREADSHEET CHANGES, CHANGE THIS LIST
columns.newCol("recvdate" , {quantfield=false, fcn=this})
columns.newCol("fname" , {quantfield=false, fcn=this})
columns.newCol("lname" , {quantfield=false, fcn=this})
Trouble is, these bomb if Columns and Columns.new() are defined below
them. I can do this above them:
local Columns
and then define Columns below, but if I do this:
local Columns, Columns.new
then it bombs with:
slitt@mydesk:/d/at/lua/massmail$ ./colnames.lua
/usr/bin/lua: ./colnames.lua:3: unexpected symbol near '.'
slitt@mydesk:/d/at/lua/massmail$
Is there a syntax to forward declare both Columns and Columns.new(),
or will I have to byte the bullet and make those definitions in a
separate file that I must require?
Thanks
SteveT
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
http://www.recession-relief.US
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt