[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: lexical goto would include full continuations?
- From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@...>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:11:47 +0200
Hallo,
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
>
> The major one that I forgot to mention (!) is that both SML/NJ and Chicken
> Scheme do CPS conversion of the code which eliminates all function
> returns.
Which is not mandatory. Roberto's argument about assignment
conversion are right on the spot, though.
--
-alex
http://www.artisancoder.com/
- References:
- lexical goto would include full continuations?, Charles Engelhard
- Re: lexical goto would include full continuations?, Tony Finch
- Re: lexical goto would include full continuations?, David Kastrup
- Re: lexical goto would include full continuations?, Tony Finch
- Re: lexical goto would include full continuations?, David Kastrup
- Re: lexical goto would include full continuations?, Tony Finch
- Re: lexical goto would include full continuations?, David Kastrup
- Re: lexical goto would include full continuations?, Tony Finch
- Re: lexical goto would include full continuations?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: lexical goto would include full continuations?, Tony Finch
