[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences
- From: Marc Balmer <marc@...>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:11:27 +0200
Am 29.06.2011 18:55, schrieb David Kolf:
Edgar Toernig wrote:
I know that Lua's authors try to avoid bloat, but these additional
176 bytes (that's what an implementation of the \u4x/\U8x variant on
x86-32 costs) are IMHO very well spent.
It's not just those 176 bytes. To support UTF-8 properly the string
pattern functions (find, match, ...) would also need to recognize UTF-8
characters as single characters in character sets. And then you would
need to extend all the predefined classes (%a, %c, %g, ...). This
updated pattern matching would break the classic C character handling.
To avoid incompatibilities a second version of the pattern matching
functions would be needed. (Though I guess they could share a lot of
code). Maybe this could be a compile time option.
A half baked solution (just escapes, not patterns) should be avoided in
my opinion, as I guess many users will try something like
I strongly second this. Unicode is far more than a few escape sequences...
If you need unicode support, provide the needed functions to Lua through
the C API, I'd say.