[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Plea for the support of unicode escape sequences
- From: Lorenzo Donati <lorenzodonatibz@...>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:24:03 +0200
On 28/06/2011 21.49, Ico wrote:
* On Tue Jun 28 21:08:10 +0200 2011, Edgar Toernig wrote:
As it's the last chance for probably 5 or 6 years to ask for it:
Could the next version have support for Unicode escape sequences?
(like "A smiley: \u263a, an en-dash: \u2013, an ellipsis: \u2026")
Could you just not enter the literal UTF-8 symbol into your strings?
Any decent editor supports UTF-8 these days, so there should be no need
for special encoding of these characters ? ☺ is easier to read then
I see two problems:
1. sometimes two different glyphs may seem the same (think as a 3rd
millenium version of "don't put uppercase Os where they can be mistaken
for 0s"). Or they may look different, but in different ways on different
2. even if you have an editor capable of displaying and entering glyphs,
you may lack the appropriate fonts. Don't assume the files containing
Unicode chars are always opened for viewing/editing on the same system
where they were created.
Unicode escape sequences are platform independent. They are useful for
the same reasons why ASCII codes are useful, at least for people working