[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: LuaJIT without the JIT?
- From: Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@...>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:40:52 -0500
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Alex Queiroz <email@example.com> wrote:
> The "static" here is not about
> typing, but instead "analysing without running the code."
true, but when the variables don't have a static type, there's very
little that can be known without running the code.
remember that non-JIT compilers can't _guess_, they have to _prove_
they're covering all possibilities.