dcharno<dcharno@comcast.net> writes:
Its ashame. The goto syntax isn't easy on the eyes, but it was powerful
and allowed a reasonable workaround for standard patterns like
continue. But this "per function" limit really blows that; what a pity.
Hmm, no it doesn't, it just forces users to pick meaningful names
instead of just "muh, whatever, I'll just use ::continue::" -- in other
words, the result is probably _better_ than a simple "continue" in most
cases...
[If continue were the sort of thing that gets used _a lot_ maybe this
would be too high a burden. But it's not.]
