[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: LuaJIT missing from language shootout benchmarking site
- From: Leo Razoumov <slonik.az@...>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 06:38:18 -0400
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 21:46, Isaac Gouy <email@example.com> wrote:
> The current maintainer is the same person who included LuaJIT 5 years ago, and happily publicised LuaJIT.
kudos to you for including LuaJIT 5 years ago! In order for me to
better understand logic behind your decisions would you be so kind to
shed some light on the reasons behind keeping two Ruby implementations
-- Ruby-1.9 and JRuby. Would it be more consistent to keep just one?