[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: os.time() vs. isdst
- From: Dirk Laurie <dpl@...>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:36:49 +0200
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 01:52:52AM +0200, Jeff Smith wrote:
> Hi
>
> > In a Unix system (where the epoch is 00:00:00 UTC, January 1, 1970)
> > running in Rio de Janeiro (which is three hours west of Greenwich), we
> > have the following examples:
>
> > It seems reasonable to assume that the author did not move to another
> > country between the two examples.
>
> :)
>
> Thanks for updating that page so swiftly then Roberto, I am sure that
> paragraph wasnt there the first time I read it tonight. Cough Cough !!
Have you checked your duly purchased paper copy of PiL2?
Dirk
- References:
- Re: os.time() vs. isdst, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: os.time() vs. isdst, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: os.time() vs. isdst, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: os.time() vs. isdst, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: os.time() vs. isdst, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- RE: os.time() vs. isdst, Jeff Smith
- Re: os.time() vs. isdst, Louis Mamakos
- RE: os.time() vs. isdst, Jeff Smith
- Re: os.time() vs. isdst, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- RE: os.time() vs. isdst, Jeff Smith