Re: iterating over ... ?

[Benoit Germain <bnt.germain@...>]

2011/4/6 Jerome Vuarand <jerome.vuarand@gmail.com>

2011/4/4 Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@gmail.com>:

> On Apr 4, 2011, at 9:43 PM, Patrick Donnelly wrote:

> [...]

The original request was to avoid calling select or creating tables,
hence the increased length and lack of support for nil in my
proposals.

Oh well, all this stemmed from the fact that I initially tried to index 
... with operator [] like I could have done for a table, and this failed because
...[n]
behaves as
{...}[1][n]
instead of
{...}[n]

But as I said, this is no big deal.

-- 
Benoit.