Re: Possible bug with the length operator

[Axel Kittenberger <axkibe@...>]

> According to the Lua reference manual, the length operator (#) is supposed
> to return the highest consecutive numerical index. This means the above code
> SHOULD return 2, because 3 is nil.

No, it doesnt say that. it can be any n so that t[n] ~= nil and t[n+1]
== nil or 1 if t[1] == nil.