[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: filter an array in place
- From: Steve Litt <slitt@...>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:43:41 -0500
I tested this -- it works. If you really want to totally get rid of the bad
stuff, you need a second loop to delete from dst to #tab, but what I did is I
just set tab[dst] to nil so that an iPairs() would stop after the last valid
character, and #tab would be the subscript of the last valid character.
The second loop is just to print out the stuff. The filtering all happened in
the first loop:
#!/usr/bin/lua
local tab = {"a", "a", "c", "a", "d", "a" }
local dst = 1
for src, val in ipairs(tab) do --assume tight array, otherwise use while
if src~=dst and val ~= "a" then
tab[dst] = val
dst = dst + 1
end
end
tab[dst] = nil
for src, val in ipairs(tab) do --stop at the nil you just inserted
print(val)
end
On Thursday 13 January 2011 23:12:40 Emmanuel Oga wrote:
> Hello, I'm looking for the best proper way of doing this:
>
> local tab = {"a", "a", "c", "a", "d", "a" }
>
> for index, val in ipairs(tab) do
> if val == "a" then -- could be any other complex condition
> table.remove(tab, index)
> end
> end
>
> -- WRONG: tab = { "a", "c", "d" }, should be { "c", "d" }
>
> So removing elements from a container _while you are iterating it_ is
> wrong in most languages. I'm looking for the nicest and proper way of
> doing it.
>
> Two methods I came up with:
>
> 1) popping from the array and pushing to a new one if the condition is met.
> 2) Iterating first, storing indexes to remove, then removing one by
> one (compensating index offset as a result of each removed elements)
>
> http://pastie.org/1458808
>
> Is there any other more elegant way?
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> EmmanuelOga.com - Software Developer
>