lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 16:48, Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com> wrote:
Modern LJ2 seems to be too smart for my benchmark (or I did break something), so no results for LJ2 this time.

No, that is not true. It was engram's string.dump() that failed. I should improve error reporting in my benchmarker.

Here are the results for LJ2b5:

$ ./run_benchmark.sh benchmark.lua 1e6
Results:
luajit2
-------------------------------------------------------------------
                name |     rel | abs s / iter = us (1e-6 s) / iter
-------------------------------------------------------------------
             marshal |  1.0000 |   4.09 /    1000000 = 4.090000 us
        luabins_load |  1.0244 |   4.19 /    1000000 = 4.190000 us
        luabins_save |  1.2567 |   5.14 /    1000000 = 5.140000 us
           unmarshal |  1.2738 |   5.21 /    1000000 = 5.210000 us
          loadstring |  2.6895 |  11.00 /    1000000 = 11.000000 us
              concat |  5.1394 |  21.02 /    1000000 = 21.020000 us
                tstr |  7.1222 |  29.13 /    1000000 = 29.130000 us
          tserialize |  8.7457 |  35.77 /    1000000 = 35.770000 us

Alexander.