On 12/16/10 8:14 PM, Dirk Laurie wrote:
Yeah but, even if it is demonstrably perfectly defensible and air tight as is,
there are people who feel a different behavior would be fitting Lua's elegance
better, be more intuitive, less error prone, require less deeper level
understanding to program swiftly on the higher level. To me it seems less
personally motivated than you judge it.
Make it "Could Lua benefit from a more useful, or maybe 'safe', behavior of #t for holy ts?"