[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Slices (Was: Holes)
- From: Dirk Laurie <dpl@...>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:47:44 +0200
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:56:12AM +0200, David Manura wrote:
> you'd probably prefer it in the
> form of slices instead: `t[3:6] = ...` (i.e. replace elements 3
> through 6 with the elements in the vararg list).
Two extensions to Lua needed:
3:6 --> {3,4,5,6}
a[{3,4,5,6}] --> {a[3],a[4],a[5],a[6]}
Will this break many programs? I doubt it: table-valued keys
are close to useless.
> a[{1,2}]='s'
> print(a[{1,2}])
nil
At present a table-valued key hashes the address of the table.
You can't use it, as I tried above, to simulate double indexing.
The lexical analyzer will have to handle str:find(...) as a call
to an overloaded function __colon(str,find)(..) (or whatever)
instead of as syntactic sugar. May be hard to do.
Dirk