Re: toLua++ question

[Michal Kottman <k0mpjut0r@...>]

On 11 December 2010 22:42, Anders Backman <andersb@cs.umu.se> wrote:
> I was working with LQT for a while. But it was hard to get all the way. As
> it was using a C++toXML parser, something that is close to impossible to get
> through all our code. It chokes on quite a few things.

Have you tried the Lqt generator lately? It currently binds most of
the Qt API, including things like certain operators, virtual methods
and several useful templated classes.

I want to know on what code does the parser/generator fail on. I want
to make it more generic, and maybe separate it as
"yet-another-C++-Lua-binder". To be more realistic, I want to make it
automatically bind the OpenCV API to Lua.

Any examples of incorrect behavior and/or comments on the
parser/generator would be helpful.