Re: Lightweight function syntax: no need to change Lua

[steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>]

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Dirk Laurie <dpl@sun.ac.za> wrote:
> Do I really want people to perpetrate such things and still claim
> they're writing Lua?  Food for thought.

Although this has been done without any modifications to the language,
showing that a sufficiently powerful language is always capable of
monstrosities.  They can claim it's Lua, but they can't claim it's
_good_ Lua ;)

steve d.