Thanks Mike for clarification.
but I wanted to know that on what basis Action Names and their numbers are assigned for a particular architecture. I have checked out both x86 & ppc code. The build_actionlist is so confusing in itself. can you put some light on these aspects also. As action names are different from opcodes for a particular architecture.
--Neha.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Mike Pall
<mikelu-1009@mike.de> wrote:
neha mahajan wrote:
> we have already disassemble the lj_vm.s, but its corresponding pseudo code
> or logic functionality of these assembly functions are still missing.
There is no need to disassemble anything; LuaJIT is distributed
with source code. The interpreter is generated from the *.dasc
files and these have all the comments.
--Mike
