Re: Bytecode abuse in Lua 5.2 (-work4)

[Henk Boom <henk@...>]

On 22 August 2010 09:09, Stuart P. Bentley <stuart@testtrack4.com> wrote:
> It'd probably be a good idea to make rejecting bytecode in load() an #ifdef,
> with a prominent note in the manual / README that it should be defined in
> essentially anything that runs editable scripts and/or doesn't have its own
> bytecode verification routine.

Maybe having load() reject bytecode and adding a debug.load() that
accepts it would communicate the right message.

    henk