[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua as replacement for Bash scripting
- From: Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@...>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:13:32 +0400
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 06:50, David Manura <dm.lua@math2.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com> wrote:
<...>
> local t = sh "ls $.Q($path) | $.filter $f | grep ^sg.* | $.totable"
> giving the impression that Lua functions are executed just like shell
> commands but in effect those are really pseudo commands executed
> in-process (sort-of like how sh has built-in commands).
> However, what about simply this?
> exec 'ls /dev | lua -e $Q(for line in io.stdin:lines(true) do
> io.stdout:write(line,line) end) | grep ^sg.*'
But I want a closure here! Spawning another Lua process is no fun.
> Other possibilities include the script passed to "lua -e" opening up a
> socket (lsocket) to the main script and filtering its I/O through
> that. That may be another way to implement the bidirectional pipe in
> a cross platform way.
Yes, that is a good thing to keep in mind.
Alexander.
- References:
- Lua as replacement for Bash scripting, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: Lua as replacement for Bash scripting, Jerome Vuarand
- Re: Lua as replacement for Bash scripting, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: Lua as replacement for Bash scripting, Jerome Vuarand
- Re: Lua as replacement for Bash scripting, Hisham
- Re: Lua as replacement for Bash scripting, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: Lua as replacement for Bash scripting, Hisham
- Re: Lua as replacement for Bash scripting, David Manura
- Re: Lua as replacement for Bash scripting, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: Lua as replacement for Bash scripting, David Manura