[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: RE: Building Secondary Modules
- From: "Antonio Scuri" <scuri@...>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:09:26 -0300
> Totally unrelated, but when building Lua on one of my Linux boxes,
> with the -lreadline link option, the resulting binary ("lua", the
> interpreter) run through ldd shows the dependency is only
> "libreadline.so", not the fully qualified path. So there must be a way
> to tell ld to store only the unqualified dll filename. You can try to
> use an absolute path in your -L command rather than a relative one.
> Otherwise dig into ld documentation (though I've been unsuccessful on
> that path).
Ok. Thank you. :)