[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: explicitly defining table length + _ARG proposal
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@...>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:50:33 +0200
* Juris Kalnins:
> Main issue is that automatically maintaining the hidden "n" has a
> runtime cost that is not acceptable for all users.
The proposal linked to by David avoids that because the explicit
length is never decreased automatically. This should be good enough
in many cases (including {...}).
