Re: Numeric for loops...

[Duncan Cross <duncan.cross@...>]

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Duncan Cross <duncan.cross@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Jonathan Castello <twisolar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think it's slightly lamentable that "for i=1, 10, 100" is almost
>> identical to "for i in 1, 10, 100", but that's just me.
>
> You mean, just syntactically, you dislike that they are so similar? Or
> you think that they are actually semantically similar?
>
> for i =
>
> 1 is *not* a function. 10 is not an invariant
> I disagree, I do not think they are almost identical at all. 1

Argh. I am very sorry for this perplexing noise. I sent it completely
accidentally way before I was ready. Stupid fingers.

-Duncan