Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop

[steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>]

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com> wrote:
>        "The behavior of next is undefined if, during the traversal,
> you assign any value to a non-existent field in the table. You may
> however modify existing fields. In particular, you may clear existing
> fields."

 I'd forgot that adding items was going to be unspecified.

But 'clear existing fields' is a very useful guarantee!

steve d.