|
On Mon, 24 May 2010 14:57:55 -0700, M Joonas Pihlaja <jpihlaja@cc.helsinki.fi> wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010, Jonathan Castello wrote:Please let me know what you think, I'd really appreciate it.I'm slightly wary of your proposal because it 1) adds even more implicit magic to the language, 2) breaks the current iterator protocol, 3) is likely to have significant overhead in the loop setup compared to explicit numeric for loops. Cheers, Joonas