[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?
- From: Jonathan Castello <twisolar@...>
- Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 19:53:27 -0700
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jonathan Castello <twisolar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could we perhaps return to "for k,v in t do", and have the generic-for
> use the __pairs metamethod of its target as the iterator factory? If
> no __pairs exists, default to next().
For posterity, I meant "default to pairs()".
~Jonathan
