Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto()

[spir ☣ <denis.spir@...>]

On Tue, 4 May 2010 12:33:20 +0200
Benoit Germain <bgermain@ubisoft.fr> wrote:

> But don't ask me which solution I prefer, I don't know. As it happens, were something to change, what I would advocate would be to have the current table changed to a pure hash, and the addition of another separate "vector" type.

++

This would allow having most array/sequence methods we miss now without polluting general (associative) table.

Denis
________________________________

vit esse estrany ☣

spir.wikidot.com