[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: yet another language comparision failing to include Lua
- From: Tim Johnson <tim@...>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:39:41 -0800
* Leo Razoumov <email@example.com> [100325 11:29]:
> On 2010-03-25, Klaus Ripke <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > looks like there was a 4 language version around in December,
> > then Haskell got added in January, recently even Lisp -
> > anybody out there who could add a row and column for Lua to
> > "How Programming Language Fanboys See Each Others' Languages" ?
> > http://wurstball.de/static/ircview/pictures/749cd15bf9d0254286148f468567b29e.jpg
> > have fun ;)
> First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
> then you win.
> -- Mahatma Gandhi
FYI: I was at one time personally acquainted with Sarah Palin. Now
as far as Ruby seen by lisp fans it is clear from the image that
lisp fans have some unrealistic expectations of ruby (I mean
Sarah) and furthermore probably have some vision problems.