[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Treatment of negative index to select()
- From: Doug Rogers <douglua@...>
- Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:11:40 -0500
Doug Rogers wrote:
Since 5.2 is still undergoing change, I'm wondering if the authors would
consider changing the (not well documented) behavior of select() for
Apologies for replying to myself. I realized that I had checked the code
but not the documentation in 5.2. The documentation in 5.2 properly
defines the behavior for negative indexes down to -n.
But I'm still interested in the other two things (below -n as an error
versus 1, and a means to get the arguments from the beginning.