Re: Storing state information (was Re: Ah, those uninitiated people...)

["Peter Sommerfeld" <lua@...>]

Am 15.01.2010, 11:34 Uhr, schrieb Mike Pall <mikelu-1001@mike.de>:
> Lua 5.1  LJ1    LJ2
> ------------------------------------------------------
> 14.08    2.16   0.10  Standard (solid)
> 14.92    4.62   0.10  Standard (metatable)
> 14.28    2.66   0.10  Object using closures (PiL 16.4)
>  9.14    1.68   0.10  Object using closures (noself)
>  7.30    1.10   0.10  Direct Access
>  1.22    0.34   0.10  Local Variable
>
> [Yes, this really means method access + method calls can be up to
> 150x faster with LJ2, when compared in isolation. On real-world,
> non-micro-benchmarks you won't see that much of a speedup.]

I'm not sure I understand the benchmark and the numbers correctly.
Does it mean that there is no reason to avoid costly patterns
like objects using closures (PiL 16.4) and others anymore?

Peter